AI that doesn't just chat — it acts.

Full scope, including the Secure Build tier. Our MSA carries CCPA/CPRA service-provider clauses covering the twenty state privacy regimes now in force, none of which impose data localisation.

Two exclusions: no US federal, ITAR/EAR-controlled or CUI-touching systems, and no agent with access to protected health information unless your payer contracts expressly permit offshore processing.

Full scope for private-sector work. UK B2B services from a non-UK supplier are handled under the VAT reverse charge, and an outsourced service delivered from Mumbai sits outside IR35 where the contract is a genuine service rather than labour supply — which is how we write it.

Transfers run on the UK IDTA with a documented Transfer Risk Assessment, because India is not on the UK adequacy list. UK public sector is closed to us — see below.

Deliverable as a fixed-scope engineering project with pseudonymised or synthetic data in development environments. That is correct practice anyway and it collapses the transfer question.

India has no EU adequacy decision, so any engagement touching EU personal data needs SCC Module 2 plus a documented Transfer Impact Assessment. We do not sell EU AI Act high-risk readiness — those obligations are deferred to December 2027 and only Article 50 transparency is live.

Full scope on the mainland, and a close fit for the Secure Build tier — the DIFC's 2026 consultation on embedding AI safety in processing systems is the clearest agent-governance signal any regulator has issued.

Health data and Dubai government data carry hard in-country processing requirements and are closed to offshore delivery. Where a DIFC or ADGM entity is in scope, note that neither free zone lists India as an adequate jurisdiction, so Article 42 safeguards apply.

A chatbot answers — an agent acts. Agents plan multi-step workflows, call tools (APIs, your CRM, your inbox), and execute tasks autonomously with human-in-the-loop gates where it matters.

We benchmark your specific task across frontier APIs (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini) and open-weights (Llama, Mistral) on a small eval set. We pick on cost, latency, and accuracy — not on hype.

Every agent ships with adversarial eval harnesses, prompt-injection red-teaming, output filters, PII redaction at ingestion, and human approval gates on destructive actions.

Yes — when fine-tuning beats prompting on cost/latency/accuracy. We use OpenAI fine-tunes, LoRA on open-weights, or distillation, depending on the volume and the target metric.

You own everything — the prompts, the eval sets, the fine-tuned weights, the customer data. We deploy to your cloud or ours. No data is used to train external models.

Working prototype in 2 weeks. Production-grade with monitoring + evals in 4–8 weeks. Each weekly demo is shippable.

From $8,500/mo, every agent ships with a design-time threat model, tool-permission scoping, a guardrail and output-handling layer, human-in-the-loop gates on high-impact actions, and an adversarial eval suite running in your CI. You also get a security handover pack written to be pasted straight into an enterprise procurement questionnaire.

Because your buyer will ask. The 2026 SIG update added an expanded AI governance section, CAIQ now names ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF, and roughly 40% of enterprise applications will run task-specific agents by the end of 2026 against about 6% of organisations reporting an advanced AI security strategy. The questionnaire arrives whether or not the agent was built for it.

No. Secure Build is engineering, not assurance. We harden agents we build; we do not issue an independent audit, attestation or certification of them, and we do not certify any system as secure. Independent review of a withRemote-built agent should be commissioned from a third party — we will help you scope it, and we will not do it ourselves.